This is the “War of Thrones” of systems administration. And, unlike many theoretical discussions, here the numbers speak louder.
The Benchmark Summary (The Numerical Verdict)
In high-traffic scenarios, the performance hierarchy generally looks like this:
| Metric | Apache (v2.4) | Nginx (v1.2x) | LiteSpeed (LSWS/OLS) |
| Architecture | Based on Processes (MPM Prefork/Worker)* | Event-Driven (Asynchronous) | Event-Driven (Asynchronous) |
| Static Files (RPS) | Low (~1.000 – 3.000) | Very High (~15.000+) | Very High (~20.000+) |
| PHP/WordPress (RPS) | Low (~200 – 500 sem cache) | Medium/High (with FastCGI Cache) | Extreme (with LSCache + LSAPI) |
| Memory Usage | High (scales linearly with connections) | Low and steady | Low and steady |
| Support for .htaccess | Native (Excellent) | It cannot be tolerated. | Native (LSWS) / Partial (OLS)** |
| HTTP/3 (QUIC) | Support via module (complex) | Experimental/recent support | Native and Robust Support |
*Apache has MPM Event, which improves performance, but still carries the burden of the legacy architecture. **OpenLiteSpeed reads .htaccess, but requires a reboot to apply changes, unlike LiteSpeed Enterprise.
Detailed Competitor Analysis
Apache: The Veteran Compatible
The Apache is like a Swiss Army knife. It works almost anywhere and can run almost anything.
- Where it falls short: Under heavy load. Because it creates a process (or thread) for each connection, it consumes RAM quickly. If you have 10,000 simultaneous accesses, the server will likely crash due to lack of memory before the CPU bottlenecks.
- The Benchmark: In PHP “Hello World” tests, Apache is consistently the slowest, frequently delivering 5 to 10 times fewer requests per second than its rivals.
Nginx: The Performance Standard
Nginx changed the game with its event-driven architecture. It doesn’t create a new process for each user; a single process manages thousands of connections.
- Where it shines: Static content and as a reverse proxy. It’s unbeatable for serving images, CSS, and JS.
- Where it ties: In PHP. Nginx doesn’t process PHP natively; it passes it to php-fpm. Although very fast, this communication generates a slight overhead.
The Reality: A well-configured Nginx with FastCGI Cache competes head-to-head with LiteSpeed. The difference is that configuring this in Nginx is complex and manual.
LiteSpeed (LSWS / OpenLiteSpeed): The Speed Specialist
LiteSpeed was built to read Apache configuration files (.htaccess) but uses Nginx’s event-driven architecture.
- The “Secret Weapon” (LSAPI + LSCache): LiteSpeed uses a proprietary API (LSAPI) to communicate with PHP, which is faster than php-fpm. Additionally, the LiteSpeed caching plugin (LSCache) communicates directly with the web server kernel to serve static caching, completely bypassing PHP execution.
- The Benchmark: In specific WordPress tests, LiteSpeed with LSCache enabled frequently shows loads of 500 to 2,000 requests per second, while Apache struggles at 50-100.
“Real War” Scenarios
Scenario A: Static Files (CDN/Images)
- Winner: Technical Tie (Nginx vs LiteSpeed)
Both destroy Apache. LiteSpeed tends to win slightly in synthetic tests (small files), but in the real world, the difference is imperceptible to the end user.
Scenario B: Shared Hosting / Multiple Sites
- Winner: LiteSpeed (Enterprise)
- It reads Apache’s .htaccess files without extra configuration. For a hosting provider, migrating from Apache to Nginx is a nightmare of rewriting rules. Migrating to LiteSpeed is “drop-in” (instantaneous).
Scenario C: High-Traffic WordPress
- Winner: LiteSpeed
- The LSCache plugin integration is superior. While in Nginx you need to configure complex cache purge rules for FastCGI, LiteSpeed does this “out-of-the-box” with ESI (Edge Side Includes) support to, for example, cache the entire page but leave the “shopping cart” dynamic.
Verdict: Which one to choose?
Use Apache if: You are in a local development environment, learning, or have a very specific legacy system that relies on obscure Apache modules.
Use Nginx if: You are a root system administrator, like total control, manage your own configuration files (.conf), and don’t need .htaccess. It’s the preferred choice for Docker, Microservices, and as a Reverse Proxy.
Use LiteSpeed (or OpenLiteSpeed) if: Your focus is WordPress, Magento, or raw PHP performance with minimal configuration. If you want the speed of Nginx but the convenience of .htaccess, LiteSpeed is the only option.
If you are looking for maximum WordPress performance today, LiteSpeed + LSCache is, benchmark after benchmark, the most efficient combination in terms of resources vs. throughput.
See more: Benchmark Script on Linux
See more: Complete Guide to DirectAdmin for Administrators: Installation, Security, and Performance
See more: How do I add security headers using Cloudflare?
See more: How to Create an OS Template in Virtualizor: Complete Guide 2025
Veja mais: Script para benchmark no Linux